Call us

Field experience & Case study

Order this Paper

Field Experience D: Application of Content

View Rubric

Details:

clinical field experience.

Complete two or more field experiences from the Focused Field Experience Activity List D:

Observe any two of these activities and express your experience in detail.(250 words)

  • Develop and teach a project-based lesson plan to students with exceptionalities one-on-one, in a small group, or in a whole class,that focuses on various disciplines and cross-disciplinary skills. (InTASC 5)
  • Develop and teach a lesson plan to students with exceptionalities one-on-one, in a small group, or in a whole classthat engages students in applying content to real-world problems. (InTASC 5)
  • Develop and teach a lesson plan to students with exceptionalities one-on-one, in a small group, or in a whole classthat facilitates students’ use of technology to maximize content learning. (InTASC 5)
  • Develop and teach a lesson plan to students with exceptionalities one-on-one, in a small group, or in a whole classthat promotes students’ use of a variety of forms of communications to different audiences. (InTASC 5)
  • Develop and teach a lesson plan to students with exceptionalities one-on-one, in a small group, or in a whole classthat engages students’ in problem solving for local and/or global issues. (InTASC 5)
  • Develop and teach a lesson plan to students with exceptionalities one-on-one, in a small group, or in a whole classthat supports literacy development across content areas. (InTASC 5)

Your field experiences should include a combination of K-8 and 9-12 grade level settings and students with exceptionalities. Reflect upon your field experience choices in a 250-word summary.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Field Experience D: Application of Content

  1
No Evidence
0.00%
2
Nominal Evidence
69.00%
3
Unacceptable Evidence
74.00%
4
Acceptable Evidence
87.00%
5
Target Evidence
100.00%
70.0 % Content  
40.0 % Reflections on Application of Content [InTASC: 5; CEC 3] No submission. Reflection does not relate to the assignment. Reflection does not apply knowledge, skills, and/or tools across concepts and/or content areas to engage students in critical thinking and/or problem solving on local and/or global issues in an acceptable manner. Adequate reflection on applying knowledge, skills, and tools across concepts and content areas to engage students in critical thinking and problem solving on local and global issues in an acceptable manner is provided. Thorough reflection on applying knowledge, skills, and tools across concepts and content areas to engage students in critical thinking and problem solving on local and global issues is provided.
70.0 % Content  
30.0 % Application of Conclusions to Practice [InTASC: 5, 9; CEC 3, 6] No submission. Responses on applying conclusions to practice are not related to assignment. Responses on applying conclusions to practice are unclear or under-developed. Application of conclusions drawn reflects development as a professional. Application of conclusions drawn reflects development as a professional with an awareness of the needs of students, parents, and community.
20.0 % Organization and Effectiveness  
20.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) No submission. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format  
10.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
100 % Total Weightage

Order this Paper

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes